|
|
'Boss' Wins DARPA's Urban Challenge Sunday, November 04, 2007 - Sarah Gingichashvili & Iddo Genuth Home >> News >> AI
|
|
|
After several hours of highly eventful competition Carnegie Mellon University's robotic car team won DARPA's 2007 Urban Challenge. "Boss", as it is known, was able to complete all three main missions and 19 submissions successfully scooping gold for Carnegie Mellon and its partners with Stanford in second place and VictorTango from Virginia Tech coming in third. Hundreds watched the Urban Challenge on site with thousands watching at home using DARPA's live feed as the 11 robotic cars drove, crashed (into each other and into walls) got stuck in robotic traffic jams and even passed other human driven cars as they raced towards the finish line, in what shall be remembered as the first realistic urban robotic competition.
|
|||||||||
The Race
The Annie WAY team from Germany got stuck in a roundabout for a long period of time before successfully moving along. All cars were doing well on the initial off-road part of the competition until the second German team – CarOLO – got stuck in the sand and had to recive some human assistance in digging itself out. The UCF team's Knight Rider got stuck in a junction for a long time but eventually managed to continue. A few minutes later, the Skynet robo-car from Cornell almost crashed into another car and then crossed to the opposite side of the road and remained there for a few minutes before it finally continued. An interesting event happened when the IVS car stopped and created a small traffic jam, which led to its disqualification and to the disqualification of team Annie WAY. Almost at the same time, the huge Oshkosh Truck, called TerraMax, nearly drove straight into a building and was the third car to be disqualified. The next close call happened between Little Ben and the Knight Rider who created another "all pause" situation. Both cars eventually moved ahead successfully. The MIT team, which up to this point had a very good ride, encountered some problems in the sandy part of the track, where the vehicle stopped and started several times before clearing that section. Shortly afterwards, Odin the robotic car from the VictorTango team of Virginia Tech became the first car to finish Mission 1 (out of three missions).
Mission 2 started when both Odin and Stanford's "Junior" preformed a successful parking maneuver in an empty parking garage and continued on their way. In the meantime two other teams: Little Ben followed up by the Pittsburgh robot called "Boss" finished mission 1 and successfully started mission 2. Still in mission 1 the MIT rover entered a second head to head confrontation with the CarOLO which ended with the CarOLO being disqualified. At the same time Cornell's Skynet robo-car became the fifth car to finish mission 1 followed by MIT who was able to finish mission 1 after several more mishaps along the way. After a long and fairly uneventful drive all the reaming robotic cars rushed through mission 2 and again VictorTango became the first to finish the mission (after performing a swift park and drive procedure in a specific pre-picked parking spot) and move on to the third and final mission, followed again by Stanford's "Junior" and Pittsburgh's "Boss" robots. Mission 3 started with a small mishap for VictorTango which strayed away from the road but was able to quickly fix itself and continue its drive. The following incident was a bigger one with MIT car physically hitting Cornell's Skynet. Surprisingly both cars were unharmed and continued on their way without and significant damage to their systems. After this accident all the remaining competitors finished the second mission, brining the total number of competitors in the third and final mission to six. On the last mission Junior increasingly became the dominant competitor with a very impressive performance reaching the finish line first. The Boss from Carnegie Mellon University became the second to reach the finish line with VictorTango/Odin reaching the line third. Reaching the finish line fourth was "Little Ben" a good long time after the first three. the last two to cross the line were the robots from MIT (Talos) followed by Cornell's Skynet. Some Background
The first challenge was somewhat discouraging - no team could be named the winner and awarded the cash prize, since none of the robots succeeded in completing the final 240-kilometer challenge due to various failures along the way. The robotic car with the best result that year, designed by the "red team" from Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, went off course after completing just 12 kilometers of the track. The car got caught on the berm, causing the rubber on its front wheels to catch fire. DARPA’s second Grand Challenge was held the following year and was considered a great success. Five vehicles reached the finish line after completing the entire 212-kilometer course. “Stanley”, a robotic Volkswagen designed by a team from Stanford University, was the first official winner of the challenge, after successfully completing the race in six hours, 53 minutes and 58 seconds. Following the 2005 race, DARPA Director Tony Tether said, "These vehicles haven't just achieved world records, they've made history." While in previous challenges the only criterion by which the vehicles’ performances were measured was a set time limit in which the robots had to complete the course, this year’s participants were tested on road ethics as well, and were required to drive according to the traffic laws obeyed in California. For each traffic fault committed during the course, time penalties were added to the vehicle’s elapsed time. Furthermore, the cars were tested on speed and safety, and could be disqualified if damaging their surroundings in any way. As the technological pieces begin falling into place, experts say it will probably take two or three decades before autonomous vehicles are introduced to the consumer market. The industry is facing many challenges, and engineers say better sensors and more powerful processors are required. The development of driverless cars proceeds step by step: in recent years, much attention has been drawn to cars that park themselves, and these are already offered for sale. Sensors that can detect objects in close proximity to the vehicle, and “lane-control” systems that alert the driver when attempting to execute a dangerous pass to an adjacent lane, are already in production. The third Grand Challenge brings DARPA a step closer to its goal, declared in a 2001 Congressional mandate that resulted in the establishment of the program – “It shall be a goal of the Armed Forces to achieve the fielding of unmanned, remotely controlled technology such that . . . by 2015, one-third of the operational ground-combat vehicles are unmanned.” TFOT has recently covered MIT’s entry for the competition – the “Robocar”, which you can find here. You can find detailed information about this year’s event on the DARPA Grand Challenge official website. Further discussion of DARPA's 2007 Urban Challenge can be found here (TFOT's forums). |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
| Other Pictures |
|
Robotic Flying Jellyfish |
|
BIXI Public Bike System Concept |
| Other Articles |
|
The Future of 3D Printing |
|
2007 In Science, Medicine and Space |
|
|||
|
|||
|
I just read somewhere else Tartan Racing of Carnegie Mellon won the race. I think they are the real winner unlike what is reported in this article. Sounds like some reporter wasn't paying attention |
|||
|
|||
|
Did this site create two articles (one for CMU winning and one for Stanford winning) and put up the wrong one? The page filename is called boss-wins-darpa-urban-challenge.html |
|||
|
|||
|
I think they did put up the wrong page initially, but they've fixed it now. :*> |
|||
|
|||
|
Silly reporters. You labeled Penn's "Little Ben" vehicle as the UCF car. (see above). |
|||
|
|||
| The panthers are the mascot for Univ. of Pittsburgh, not CMU. | |||
|
|||
|
There was an initial problem with the headline which was fixed. As for the image - funny thing - it was on the USF site but it wasn't the Knight Rider - we fixed that as well - thanks. |
|||
|
|||
|
Now the page file name is stanford-s-robot-car-wins-darpa-s-urban-challenge.html even though CMU won. Also, the link title from google news says that Stanford won instead of CMU... |
|||
|
|||
|
Well these are all results of the original issue (this is what happen when you rush things). I will see about the headline however I don't have any control over Google... |
|||
|
|||
|
I was at the race and UCF did not actually hit anything. Their steering failed and unlike other teams, they weren\'t allowed to simply re-start their bot and continue. |
|||
|
|||
|
James - you made a very interesting remark - thank you. Actually the all the re-start thing was very strange to an outside viewer (I watched on the web the entire time) - it looked as if DARPA gave some cars/teams a lot of chances and disqualified other teams very easily - what do you think? |
|||
|
|||
|
I don't understand how Odin from VT was first out of start for Mission 2 and 3 and then disappeared from media converage in the final stages of Mission 3...and physically came in after the first two vehicles (Stanford and CM). If speed could not be altered...how did this happen? Each vehicle had to cover the same mission. BTW, news coverage said Stanley (Stanford) car crossed the finish line at the end of missions first...but that didn't mean it won based on DARPA and penalty scoring system. |
|||
|
|||
|
Linda - you make a right point here - I also thought of Odin as the fevorite and it was leading all along the race and was looking very strong apart from a very small mishap in the 3'rd mission which took maybe 1-2 minutes and caused it to go to the side of the road and stop. I have no answer as to how it got third and I was very surprised that Boss won and not Junior which was the first to finish and drove beautifully. I guess there were things we didn't see and things we do not understand regarding the DARPA scoring system. I can tell you this TFOT plans on doing a big follow-up article talking to all the wining teams early next year when they have time to study the data. |
|||
|
|||
|
We now have autonomous vehicles that drive like your average Floridian:-) What would the autonomous vehicle do if confronted by a human standing in the road (tankman in Tienanmen for example)? Can't have robots violating the first law. Well I guess we could put a person in each one. For speech recognition systems the holy grail is if your speech recognition system have a conversation with Yogi Berra:-) |