Feedback Form
   
Add to Google
New Catalyst Makes Efficient Fuel Cells Feasible New Catalyst Makes Efficient Fuel Cells Feasible
Friday, March 20, 2009 - Sarah GIngichashvili
Home >> News >> Green Technology
  Peralink
A team of scientists at the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), in collaboration with researchers from the University of Delaware and Yeshiva University, have developed a novel catalyst which could enable efficient production of ethanol-powered fuel cells. The scientists, whose research results were recently published in last month's edition of Nature Materials, say the new catalyst succeeds in accomplishing two previously unreachable steps necessary to oxidize ethanol and produce clean energy in fuel cell reactions.
Radoslav Adzic (Credit: BNL) 
Radoslav Adzic
(Credit: BNL)
Hydrogen fuel cells, which generate electricity in the process of converting hydrogen and oxygen into water, have long been known as difficult to produce, due to issues related to hydrogen production, storage, and transport. These complications led researchers to consider using hydrogen-rich compounds, specifically liquid ethanol, in what is today known as the "Direct Ethanol Fuel Cell." "Ethanol is one of the most ideal reactants for fuel cells," says Radoslav Adzic, senior chemist at BNL. "It's easy to produce, renewable, nontoxic, relatively easy to transport, and it has a high energy density. In addition, with some alterations, we could reuse the infrastructure that's currently in place to store and distribute gasoline."
 

Yet despite the above advantages, ethanol does have a major setback - its molecules achieve very slow and insufficient oxidation, a process responsible for breaking the compound into hydrogen ions and electrons. This has previously been the bottleneck point for efficient production of ethanol fuel cells, as scientists were unsuccessful in finding a proper catalyst that will be able to break the bonds between ethanol's carbon atoms.

Model of a ternary electrocatalyst for ethanol oxidation consisting of platinum-rhodium clusters on a surface of tin dioxide. This catalyst can split the carbon-carbon bond and oxidize ethanol to carbon dioxide within fuel cells (Credit: BNL) 
Model of a ternary electrocatalyst
for ethanol oxidation consisting
of platinum-rhodium clusters on
a surface of tin dioxide. This catalyst
can split the carbon-carbon bond
and oxidize ethanol to carbon
dioxide within fuel cells (Credit: BNL)
The new electrocatalyst, which is made of platinum and rhodium atoms on carbon-supported tin dioxide nanoparticles, was proven capable of breaking carbon bonds at room temperature and efficiently oxidizing ethanol into carbon dioxide - this as opposed to common catalysts, which produce acetalhyde and acetic acid as their main reaction products and are thus unsuitable for power generation purposes. "The ability to split the carbon-carbon bond and generate CO2 at room temperature is a completely new feature of catalysis," Adzic said. "There are no other catalysts that can achieve this at practical potentials."
 
Brookhaven researchers say their ternary catalyst's structural and electronic properties, which were determined using x-ray absorption techniques combined with data from transmission electron microscopy analyses at the Center for Functional Nanomaterials at BNL, show it to be applicable to a variety of other alternative energy solutions. "These findings can open new possibilities of research not only for electrocatalysts and fuel cells but also for many other catalytic processes," Adzic said.
 
The developed catalyst is currently undergoing extensive testing, as scientists are assessing its performance in a real fuel cell.

TFOT has previously covered a number of innovative technologies for power generation, including sugar-powered batteries, which were developed by Sony; the world's smallest fuel cell, invented at University of Illinois at Urbane-Champaign, and a new bio-fuel powered sports car developed by the Swedish car manufacturer Koenigsegg.

More information on the new catalyst can be found here.
 
Related News Flexible Nanoantenna Capture Abundant Solar Energy Flexible Nanoantenna Capture Abundant Solar Energy U.K. Scientists Developed an "Anti-printer" U.K. Scientists Developed an "Anti-printer"

Related Pictures Freeloader - Solar Charger Freeloader - Solar Charger eVaro Future Vehicle Technology eVaro Future Vehicle Technology

Other Articles Cybook Gen3 e-Book Review Cybook Gen3 e-Book Review Shedding Light on Blindness Shedding Light on Blindness



Comments & Replies (4)
Belstaff Coats   (12/27/11 - 21:48 - by Belstaff Coats)
Belstaff Jackets
Belstaff Jackets Sale
Belstaff Jackets Sale uk
Belstaff uk
ugg boots cheap
ugg boots uk sale
ugg boots cheap uk
UGG Boots UK online
UGG UK Sale
UGGs Sale
UGG Sale UK
Uggs sale uk
UGG Sale
Mens Belstaff Jackets
ICgoHfMJYKzSIU   (04/28/12 - 5:06 - by Niko)
I'm looking to buy a car here and was doing the recasreh. The Cost to
Own of Hybrids was consistently more than similar (or same) model
non-Hybrids. The only advantages Hybrids have is with the fuel costs
over the life of the car, and the Hybrid tax credit. But, they're at
a disadvantage with almost everything else. And, they're killed by
the depreciation, due it seems to the high invoice price. (O.K. I
think I just unintentionally made a really good argument for buying
Hybrids Used.)But, just to compare the two cars I'm liking, the Honda
Civic super-basic trim has a CtO of $24,200 and the Honda Civic Hybrid
$26,900. And, the Civic Hybrid is actually way more affordable and
closer to the CtO of its non-Hybrid sister model than the other
Hybrids I've been looking at.Here's what I'm thinking. The projected
Cost to Own is based on a few guesses, like how much mileage you're
likely to have, and the price of gas pretty much staying where it
is.Now I don't want to read doomsday predictions about how we're going
to go all Mad Max. I don't. But, it's natural to suppose the trend
of gas prices going up is going to continue.I mean the reason it
happened in the first place is because people in developing countries
have been buying cars, so the demand for gas has gone up. These
countries aren't done developing. Or, to put it another way, there's
alot of people in the world who haven't bought a car yet.Back to the
Civic I figure with the differences in CtOs not including the cost of
gas ($4,300), the cost of gas would pretty much have to double
($4,300/($8,600-$6,200)=~1.8). And, that's pretty much just for the
Honda Civic. I'm having a real hard time imagining a horrible
nightmare scenario where the Ford Fusion Hybrid New would be a better
buy than the Ford Fusion New.I guess I've pretty much already answered
my own question. But, I have another scenario for all of you. If
someone starts mass producing Hydrogen Fuel Cell cars for mass sales,
what's that going to do to the price of gas? I'd expect it to go down
partly because the demand for gas would be stemmed somewhat, but
mostly just because the gas companies would want to incentivise their
consumers keeping combustion cars.I guess the big question there is,
how likely is that to happen in the next 5 years? Or however long?
Isn't it odd how these alternative cars have the potential to
sabotage each other?And, how competitive is hydrogen with gas as a
fuel? Obviously, there's the old issue that hydrogen would have to
build their distribution from the ground up. But, once that's done,
how much would a mile fueled by gas cost vs. a mile fueled by
hydrogen?Gas comes out of the ground with it's energy already in it.
Petroleum pumps try to be (and are) highly energy efficient. But,
pumping a liquid out of minerals Well, isn't that like squeezing
blood from a stone?Hydrogen you have to use up energy to electrolyze
it or refine it from fossil fuels. I'm not bothered so much by the
greenhouse implications. From an engineering standpoint it's an
energy storage device. What's the cost? Electricity is cheap.
Right?Then there's the comparative fuel economies of fuel cell and
combustion cars. Hydrogen is more energy intensive than gas. A full
tank is lighter. The lightening of the cars load would give it a
slight advantage in fuel economy. Wouldn't it? (Get the image of
hydrogen making balloon floaty cars out of your head please. It so
doesn't work that way.) Also, since the internal drag is on a much
shorter drive train, wouldn't that give Hydrogen Fuel Cell cars a
tremendous advantage in fuel economy?So an swers, are you saying that
if I asked these other questions separately you WOULD answer them?
Besides I'm dubious of that on it's own, it kind of sounds like Y!A
points farming to me, at a cost to me!Beyond that it's occurred to me
you don't have to double the price of gas. For vocations that involve
alot of driving you could easily more than double the mileage and the
fuel consumption. Like I imagine Taxi companies, if they're not using
Hybrids are pretty much losing money.From the National Hydrogen
Association: The estimated costs for producing and delivering
hydrogen to thefueling station using today’s technologies vary from
$2.10/gallon of gasoline equivalent (gge) to $9.10/gge. These hydrogen
costs do not include highway taxes and do include the increased fuel
efficiency of fuel cell vehicles compared to gasoline-powered hybrid
electric vehicles. So best case scenario hydrogen is just
competitive with gas.An swers, sorry you did write that mileage can
make a Hybrid worthwhile first. But, I still don't like the other
thing you wrote, if only because that means flooding the latest
question pages with spam questions. There's enough inane crap on here
as it is.On the other side of things, saying hydrogen as a fuel isn't
going to happen in a big way tomorrow is not the same as saying it's
never going to happen. The price of gas will go up, not least of all
because people consider it to be an essential consumable. People
don't just use less simply because demand outstrips supply, so the
price has to go way up to be prohibitive. Next we'd need to see a big
drop in the price of electricity. Maybe when they mine the moon for
tritium for fusion power, though the new fusion powerplants and the
power infrastructure will still cost money on top of the price tag of
a commercial lunar space program. I think the big energy
conglomerates like GE can afford to do it easy. But I've never been a
big fan of electric cars. I don't think the oil companies are trying
to keep them buried because they threaten their monopoly. I just
don't think they've ever really been any good. Granted tremendous
advances in battery technology have given them a huge step forward.
But, even with that and regenerative braking (an old technology which
has gained new interest) electric cars' ranges just aren't very good.
I know that sound like a strawman attack, like the old one that
electric cars can't make it up hills. But, it's true. At the least,
going on a roadtrip in an electric car is out of the question. It
doesn't help there the batteries are pretty dang heavy. But again the
weight is less important than internal drag on the drive train, as
well as regenerative braking. (Batteries are also expensive, but not
more so than engine blocks and full drive trains, and definitely not
more than hydrogen tanks and fuel cells.)
dhSQsnfXxObMY   (04/28/12 - 10:40 - by rybvnhl)
p0OkLT bsoawmtyifnu
iFTrtFkTkCAkN   (04/30/12 - 10:14 - by dpxuzrr)
hhI3Su rwhlwvdhmfro


Picture Of The Day
Robotic Space Travel with Spidernaut
Robotic Space Travel with Spidernaut

Video
Pix4D-Turns 2D Photos into 3D Images
Pix4D-Turns 2D Photos into 3D Images

Site Of The Week
Galaxy Zoo
Galaxy Zoo

Personal Column
Detroit’s Dream of Aircraft Production
Dr. Daniel Uziel
Detroit’s Dream of Aircraft Production
Terms Of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | Advertise With Us | Site Profile
Copyright © 2011 The Future of Things. All rights reserved.