|
|
Intel’s Wireless Power Technology Demonstrated Friday, November 14, 2008 - Anuradha Menon Home >> News >> Innovation
|
|
|
Intel claims it has improved the efficiency of a method for powering devices wirelessly. Intel's "Wireless Energy Resonant Link" (WREL), technology was demonstrated by transmitting electricity wirelessly to a lamp on stage and lighting a 60 watt bulb, which consumes more power than an average laptop computer.
|
||||||
|
A major concern of any wireless power technology is its possible effects on users. Fortunately during the demonstration the electricity was broadcast without electrocuting anyone who passed between the transmitter and the receiver. Intel’s lead researcher Josh Smith explained that, "The trick with wireless power is not that you can do it; it is that you can do it safely and efficiently." Magnetic fields, used by Intel’s WREL technology do not affect the human body (at least as far as we currently know), unlike electric fields, which might give the user a zap. The idea of using resonant magnetic fields to wirelessly transmit electricity was demonstrated by a team from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) who refer to their idea as WiTricity. More recently Intel researchers joined forces with MIT to explore the phenomenon known as ”resonant induction,” and the outcome is a technology capable of transmitting power several feet away without wires. Currently, resonant induction is used to recharge small devices such as electric toothbrushes. Future induction systems based on Intel’s technology will not be restricted to a physical touch between transmitter and receiver and will be able to transmit power over a distance of several feet with efficiency of 50 percent or more. “In the future, your kitchen counters might do it [supply the power],” Mr. Smith said. “You’d just drop your espresso maker down on them and you would never have to plug it in.”
Intel is not the only player in the growing market of wireless power companies. Many companies are currently working on different types of wireless power technologies. Two American start-up companies, WildCharge and WiPower, have already shown simpler wireless power technologies. Intel’s next target is to design a system to recharge a laptop computer without wires. Intel looks on this next development as a strategic move since attaching a WREL receiving antenna to a laptop would be easier than trying to implement the WREL technology into cell phones or PDAs due to their small size compared to the WREL receiver. If successful, the system would be implemented in airports, offices, and other buildings and deliver power to laptops and other mobile devices. The technology could also be built into plugged in computer components, such as monitors, to enable them to broadcast power to devices left on desks or carried into rooms. Smith says that Intel's wireless power system is still in an early stage of development and much research remains before it can be brought to the market. "You'd like to cut the last cord," Smith said. "It's great that we have wireless email and wireless internet and stuff like that but at the end of the day it would be nice to have wireless recharge as well." You can read more about MIT’s first test of the technology mentioned above in “Wireless Power Demonstrated,” where a 60 watt light bulb was able to be lit wirelessly from a distance of about 2 meters in mid 2007. Another wireless power technology is currently being developed by the U.S. company Fulton Innovation under the title “eCoupled Wireless Power.” While waiting for all those wireless power technologies to be developed, you can check out a new, fully operational, green plug universal adapter, which helps you power all your devices from a single adapter. More information can be obtained on Intel’s website and blog. Several videos show a demonstration of the WREL technology (here, here and here). |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
| Related Pictures |
|
A Step In The Right Direction |
|
360 – A New Way to Ride |
| Other Articles |
|
2008 In Technology |
|
The Future of Electronic Paper |
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ya you guys should give all your credit to Telsa since well......HE's THE ONE WHO INVENTED IT. He's was doing this before the first airplane was ever made. |
|||
|
|||
|
This is amazing and I am truly excited about it. I do believe we should be focusing on conserving power for the time being because our planet right now cannot handle a 25% gain in usage if WREL catches on. Not unless we focus on alternative energies at the same time technologies like this are being built. Once again, it is an amazing product! Thanks Intel. |
|||
|
|||
|
Yeah, where is the mention of Nikola Tesla anywhere in this article? Do some research. |
|||
|
|||
| which post does not belong? it seems planted. Thanks Intel! LOL!! | |||
|
|||
|
Yes, I second that Tesla invented this a while back. This is not "new" technology as you say. |
|||
|
|||
|
I am always one to support advances in energy technologies- but the wireless power system seems to be a distraction from more commercial plausible systems. It\'s great for low power sensors, but cell phones, laptops et al... need much more energy than can be provided via this method. And the transmitter needs to be supplied energy regardless. So it\'s a strange, novel concept. Great as web viral story, but short on solutions. Not a flame- just sharing thoughts! Rather than build wireless energy delivery systems into objects like kitchen tops (again, energy needs to be delivered to charger) we\'re just adding complexity. Unplugging everything via micro fuel cells seems much more plausible. Garry G Editor The Energy Roadmap.com http://www.theenergyroadmap.com |
|||
|
|||
|
now im fn pissed, i came up with that like 1.5 years ago, and ppl thought i was an idiot, and now this? ahh cmon. at least i can rub it in their faces. |
|||
|
|||
|
well i did, but i didnt know he did it, fkn intel and mit taking all the credit |
|||
|
|||
|
Neither Intel not Nick. And Nick, if you came up with this a year and a half ago, where\'s the patent? calm the fuck down mister. And secondly, Intel really should have given credit to Tesla, the man was a freakin genius, and never ended up developing this further because it is not practical...at all. Besides that, do you really want to power anything with magnetic fields, I mean, in a world where almost every piece of technology we own says \"Keep away from magnetic fields\"? I can\'t see powering a laptop being a good idea. Sure, now the battery\'s charged, but your harddrives been erased. This really does fall under the nifty but impractical catagory, which Tesla said 100 years ago. Thanks Intel! |
|||
|
|||
|
Gee, way to keep up with the times. This is a huge breakthrough - but you're all caught up on the fact that Tesla isn't getting the credit he's deserved? I'm sure the dead guy won't mind. As for the "keep away from magnetic fields" boy up above... Ever wonder why solid state hard-drives are becoming more and more prevalent? |
|||
|
|||
|
you miss the point .... the high frequency magnetic fields are bad for your DNA ... I will come visit you in the leukemia ward. |
|||
|
|||
|
You missed your physics lesson, resonant induction uses low-frequency magnetic fields (coupled evanescent waves?). |
|||
|
|||
|
not trying to harp on anyone. but it seems you all are just bashing on each other. from what i know of what tesla was doing was much like what we do with cell phones. using towers to power things. it wasn't practical because of that. the dierection everyone has been going seems the right one. what tesla was going to built was huge and costly. a smaller home version is always awesome. hahaha lol. |
|||
|
|||
|
2nd sentence in subtitle. Wireless Energy Resonant Link or Wireless Resonant Energy Link? |
|||
|
|||
| is there some site where you post the formulas? | |||
|
|||
| Witricity Videos, History and Information: www.witricitynet.com | |||
|
|||
|
WPC have commercial available products which can transfer 160W. The technology is mature and has also been used subsea down to 3000 meters depth. Take a look at http://www.wpc.no |
|||
|
|||
| wtf | |||
|
|||
|
Intel, our tec world (and your NEW invention )only exists , because Tesla did it...please... |
|||
|
|||
|
1) Yes, documented history that Tesla applied this first. Heck, maybe he did't discover it either but was some drinkin' buddy of his... the point is that he first "harnessed and applied it". He was a crappy politician and lost out to Edison because he was foolish enough to tell the money barons backing him at the time that it would be "free power". They didn't want to hear that, they wanted a way to bill for it. Edison promised them "wires" that could be easily meterd for billing. That is how that "horse-race" was lost by Tesla. 2. Close coupling of inductive power has been present in everything we use in the form of transformers. To a lesser degree, the principals of FM slope demodulation in radio are similar. 3. The trick with long distance inductive power broadcasting is how to overcome the nulls & nodes that occur within the waveform, multipath interference effects as well as the natural reflective, absorptive and resonance characteristics of large metal frame buildings... |
|||
|
|||
|
Guys Nikola Tesla could do this 100 years ago, without ANY loss of energy and at GREAT distances... They didnt want free wireless transfer because anyone with an antenna could just get free energy... So the guys who were funding him CRUSHED his idea and Tesla himself.. because he was too dangerous ... they had coal and oil fields.. they couldnt have a guy with crazy ideas like free energy running around... And this was the time that the worlds fate was determined.. had we listened to Tesla our world would be a greener saver better place... you could convert deserts into cultivated land by having desalinization plants in the sea to convert sea water into usable water. Tesla alone could have changed the world, and make poverty a thing of the past.. but the people in power didnt want that. Because as they have said: Its not enough for us to win, everyone else MUST lose. |
|||
|
|||
|
@roger ramjet You are right, Roger. We are electro-magneto-opto-chemical in nature. Every atom in our body has a magnetic component. Every electrical signal in our body has a magnetic component. And, on a little known fact, even the cells communicate through ElectroMagnetic optical signals we call light. Interfere with those and you have the trappings of a apocalyptic catastrophe. Ever stopped and thought "Why is there a 50% incidence of cancer in industrialized countries?" May be not by itself but it could be exacerbated by our smoking and inhaling motorcar smoke 24/7. Compounding issues and all that. Remember when smoking was recommended by doctors and lead was added to car fuel? We learn slow and our greed acts fast. |