
|
|
Laser-Hard Drives in the Making Wednesday, January 14, 2009 - Iddo Genuth Home >> News >> Storage
|
Recent advancements might finally open the door to a new storage technology that will merge optical and magnetic technologies, leading to high capacity storage devices reaching speeds thousands of times that of existing storage technologies, while boasting improved reliability.
|
||||||||||||
At the time switching magnets with lasers was considered impossible and even after it was shown to work; the conventional physical theory was unable to explain it. Since then, several groups of physicists across the world have been working on setting the theoretical basis for this innovative research, and there has been progress in explaining the phenomena now called all-optical magnetization reversal.
In his biography, Townes mentions a story that happened a short time after the maser was demonstrated: “In 1954, shortly after [James] Gordon and I built our second maser and showed that the frequency of its microwave radiation was indeed remarkably pure, I visited Denmark and saw Niles Bohr. As we were walking along the street together, he asked me what I was doing. I described the maser and its amazing performance. “But that is not possible!” he exclaimed. I assured him it was. Similarly, at a cocktail party in Princeton, New Jersey, the Hungarian mathematician John von Neumann asked what I was working on. I told him about the maser and the purity of its frequency. “That can’t be right!” he declared. But it was, I replied, telling him it had already been demonstrated. Such protests were not offhand opinions about obscure aspects of physics; they came from the marrow of these men’s bones”.
Stanciu’s story seems remarkably similar to the maser. An all-optical magnetization reversal was considered impossible until it was actually demonstrated in the lab. Physicists needed some convincing before they would even consider the idea, but once it gained the scientific community’s seal of approval applications started to appear rapidly.
In an interview TFOT recently conducted with Stanciu, he explained some of the issues facing this novel technique as well as some of its advantages. According to Stanciu, when he published the initial results of his research there were two main challenges facing the actual implementation of the technology:
However, since 2007 both challenges have been overcome:
In September 2007 TFOT covered the original laser-hard drive announcement. TFOT also covered several other advanced storage technology related stories including Mempile’s - Terabyte on a CD optical technology that can squeeze 1TB of data on a 200 layer disc the size of a conventional CD/DVD and more recently TFOT’s coverage of the future of the SSD market entitled 2009 - SSD year of revolution.
More information on Dr. Daniel Stanciu and his work can be found on his personal webpage. |
||||||||||||
|
| Related Pictures |
|
X-25E - Intel's Enterprise-Class SSD |
|
WD Launch First 2TB Hard Drive |
| Other Articles |
|
The Future of WiMAX |
|
Fujitsu S300 Scanner Review |
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Just for the record: The Seagate Cheetah 15K6 drive already has a max. internal data rate which exceeds 2.2 GBits/s. In the near future, data rates will exceed 3 GBits/s. |
|||
|
|||
|
So the light can change the polarity (effectively write the data) super fast...how do we read the data back off the disk? Can we do that with lasers too (I Doubt it)? Or will we be severely limited by read speed which will be the same as it is now? Meaning the platters will still spin, with the technology in place that we have now, the write speed will still be limited by the rotation speed of the platter, which will be required to spin to read the data. Why do I get the feeling this technology isn\'t going to happen in the next decade...or ever? |
|||
|
|||
|
Could this possibly replace standard RAM memories (DRAM, SRAM, etc) given the projected speed and density? What might this mean for instant on computers? Interesting stuff |
|||
|
|||
|
Reading the magnetic data with a laser was already possible. Writing was the problem until now. With the expected speeds and capacities I can see no need for RAM. |
|||
|
|||
|
To Greg: I would surmise that it would be the same story as we saw with CDs and DVDs - First read, then write. Or, even further back, the book. Or the cavepaintings. All of this was once proprietary, meaning for only a few with the knowledge. After a while it became open-source, or widespread knowledge. So it will be with this too. I also hope that this technology will take us on step closer to the technology described in Peter F. Hamilton's book "Misspent Youth". |
|||
|
|||
|
I wonder how much energy will it take to do this swap? How strong will the magnetic field be, and could this be done on a huge surface? |
|||
|
|||
|
by this nanotechnology. Sorry folks just wishful science. |
|||
|
|||
| to super: thats what they said about the telephone | |||
|
|||
| and forget the super-paramagnetic limit ;) | |||
|
|||
|
hi there will a laser hard drive fit in a ps3 soo i can game at 300 terabytes per second or 300 tb/s |
|||
|
|||
|
If you watch the video, the guys are saying that this is a good piece of science which could be used by other scientists as a stepping stone to future solutions. No-one is really suggesting a uranium hard drive! http://www.cekmagdurlari.com/ |
|||
|
|||
|
So the problems I see are: 1) As the Uranium decays your storage device gradually loses its data and introduces errors. 2) If you lose temperature control for an instant you lose all your data. 3) Maintaining extremely low temperatures is very expensive. It’s an interesting concept and demonstrates the idea of reducing the magnetic domains to a single molecule, but it won’t be practical until they can achieve this with stable elements and at reasonable temperatures. Cek Magdurlari |