
|
|
Gene Chip Enables Personalized Cancer Treatment Tuesday, October 23, 2007 - Einat Rotman Home >> News >> Cancer Research
|
An oncologist from Michigan has devised a new approach to clinical medicine. Using DNA micro-array chips, Dr. Eric Lester analyzed gene expression profiles of tumors in patients with advanced incurable cancer. For each patient, he first identified certain genes associated with a favorable response to anti-cancer drugs, and then determined an individualized treatment plan according to these findings.
|
|||||
|
Dr. Eric Lester, of the Oncology Care Associates in St. Joseph, Michigan, devised an experiment that illustrates the promise of personalized medicine. He had six patients with advanced, incurable cancer. In order to determine which anti-cancer drugs would benefit each patient, Lester analyzed his patients' tumors, seeking the expression of genes associated with responsiveness to various anti-cancer drugs. He then based his drug treatment plans on the experiment's findings. To analyze gene expression in the tumors Dr. Lester used Affymetrix's DNA micro-arrays, which are small chips used to measure genetic information on a large scale. Affymetrix's gene chips can be tagged with hundreds of thousands of gene sequences that will either attract or repel pieces of DNA or RNA from a certain sample. The attraction or repulsion of the DNA and RNA indicate gene mutations (genotype testing) or gene activity patterns (expression testing) in the sample. Dr. Lester and Craig Webb, Ph.D., Director of Translational Medicine at the Van Andel Research Institute in Grand Rapids, Michigan, surveyed the scientific literature and compiled a list of genes whose expression levels may predict responsiveness to certain drugs against a type of tumors. Webb and Lester compared the tested patients' personal micro-array results to the pharmaceutical and genomic data bases and determined an individualized treatment plan for each patient. More information on Lester's study can be found on the Van Andel Research Institute website and on the American Association for Cancer Research website. In some cases, after analyzing the information derived from the chips, the doctors suggested completely different treatment strategies for patients with the same type of cancer. TFOT recently covered a couple of other research projects dealing with chips for detection of cancer biomarkers. These chips include the "lab on a chip" device enabling detection of oral cancer cells, developed at the Texas University, and the Nanocytometer, which locates cancer cells or other specific cells in the blood, developed at the University of California, Berkeley. Further discussion of personalized gene-chip based treatment can be found in the TFOT forums. |
|||||
|
| Related Pictures |
|
New Contrast Agent to Help Fight Cancer |
|
Purple Tomatoes to Fight Cancer |
| Other Articles |
|
2007 In Science, Medicine and Space |
|
2008 in Science, Medicine and Space |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
This years winner of the Otto Warburg prize, Robt A Weinberg, switches on 3 genes in human cell types and causes cancer. He switches the gene for telomerase, turns off a tumor suppressor gene, and turns on an oncogene. Telomerase alone switches another 217 genes to cancer mode (Elizabeth Blackburn) and starts glycolysis (Mohammed Kashani-Sabet). The "Greene Chip" being tested now by the CDC and the W.H.O., detects dna fragments of over 30,000 human pathogens. The Greene Chip must be made to include Weinbergs 3 genes! |
|||
|
|||
|
I assume there can be a lot of sets of genes that can cause cancer. The three you mentioned are just one example of such a set |
|||
|
|||
|
Microarrays (gene chips) examine what genes are expressed in cancer cells. It is mainly used for screening/gene discovery work. You screen 50,000 genes to discover an association and then you focus in on only a few hundred or so for more careful study by some other method like real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Genes make proteins, the molecules that comprise and maintain all the body's tissues. Genes produce their effect by sending molecules called messenger RNA to the protein-making machinery of a cell. They set the protein-making machinery in motion through a "gofer" messenger called RNA (or mRNA). The technique called RNA interference (RNA-i) allows scientists to "silence" certain genes. In RNA interference, certain molecules trigger the destruction of RNA from a particular gene, so that no protein is produced. Thus, the gene is effectively silenced. RNA interference is already being widely used in basic science as a method to study the function of genes and it is being studied as a treatment for cancer. This RNA interference occurs naturally in plants, animals, and humans. RNA interference is important for regulating the activity of genes (a fundamental mechanism for controlling the flow of genetic information). RNA interference (RNAi) interferes with mRNA, a natural molecular switch, regulating gene expression in plants, animals and humans, by "silencing" over-active or malfunctioning genes. The ability to introduce foreign DNA into cultured cells with DNA gene sequences has allowed us to assign functions to different genes and understand the mechanisms that activate or redress their function. It has made gene therapy research possible, like with the proteins Dicer and Drosha. However, giving instructions on the genetic differences that determine how a person responds to a drug will still have cancer medicine being prescribed on a "trial-and-error" basis, with adverse drug reactions remaining a major cause of injury and hospitalizations. All the gene mutation or amplification studies can tell us is whether or not the cells are potentially susceptible to this mechanism of attack. The don't tell you if one drug is better or worse than some other drug which may target this. The cell is a system, an intergrated, interacting network of genes, proteins and other cellular constituents that produce functions. You need to analyze the systems' response to drug treatments, before you find clinical responders. Genetic profiles cannot discriminate differing levels of anti-tumor activity occurring among different targeted therapy drugs. Nor can they identify situations in which it advantageous to combine a targeted drug with other types of conventional cancer drugs. Two years ago, three federal agencies, NCI, FDA, and CMS, announced a program to try to identify biological indicators, or biomarkers, which may indicate whether a cancer patient is likely to benefit from a given anti-cancer therapy, or even whether they will suffer from certain side effects. We have the biomarkers for who will respond so we don't give these powerful and expensive medicines to those who won't. Technologies, developed over the last twenty years by private researchers, hold the key to solving some of the problems confronting a healthcare system that is seeking ways to best allocate available resources while accomplishing the critical task of matching individual patients with the treatments most likely to benefit them. |